i still dont know Zinn's position on 9/11. apparently he commends Griffin for asking the questions (since Zinn is a historian and that's what historians are supposed to do). obviously this has been established already, but does he agree with the common conclusion it was an inside job? if he doesnt then they are being taken out of context, but if he does then you are right and im sorry for bothering you. but you still havnt answered this simple question ive been trying to ask since this convo began, and i cant say for sure until then. im not trying to knock Griffin or Zinn (i too commend Griffin for asking the questions, and ive always been a fan of Zinn's work in history), like youve been accusing me of doing. i agree with you about alex jones btw.