ringo78's Channel
ringo78
Joined: February 22, 2006
Last Sign In: 4 weeks ago
Videos Watched: 406
Subscribers: 92
Channel Views: 4,087

Age: 30

Report profile image violation
Connect with ringo78
Added: 2 years ago
Views: 269
3.0
00:14
Added: 2 years ago
Views: 46,576
4.0
02:51:18
Added: 2 years ago
Views: 128,934
4.0
02:20:28
Added: 2 years ago
Views: 46,323
4.5
02:06:17
Channel Comments (31)
tenseman08 (1 month ago)
yo man i came across this video i wanna know how you manage to upload a video for 2hours somethin plz tell me plz i would really appreciate it.

can i just add 2 you people out there if you believe in what you believe y cant we just leave it there.
the world is fine the way it is
if christians are dumb leave them be
if evolutionist are dumb leave them be
now go out there and enjoy your lives
Tommy12435 (2 months ago)
You upload an extreme biased video on the whole debate, is quite obvious that those three professor beat that so called "Dr. Hovind" who got his degree from a degree mill where a 5th grader have a harder time graduating grade school, than getting a degree from there.
IkBenDoen (2 months ago)
haha Kent gets OWNED so hard, the only problem is that christians dont realize it becouse they are so singleminded.
they only listen to what kent is saying instead of listening to both sides.. the ignorant bastards make me laugh :D
bluecode320 (4 months ago)
For example, Uranium 238 has a half-life of approximately 4 and a half billion years, that means that it takes a sample of Uranium 4.5 billion years to decay so that half of the sample has become a different element (this is also a type of chemical evolution) which means that if we have a sample of Uranium with 100 trillion atoms in it and we wait 4.5 billion years, half of those atoms will have decayed into different elements.

So if we find a sample of Uranium in the ground and half of it has decayed into different elements, we know the Earth is 4.5 Billion years old.
bluecode320 (4 months ago)
You may ask how we know the age of the Earth. It's because of something called radiometric dating. Some people argue that it isn't accurate but they are WRONG. It is accurate, we measure the radioactivity of an element to find it's half-life. When we know it's half-life we can compare it to samples of the element we have found in rocks in the Earth to find the age of the rocks and the minimum age of the Earth.
bluecode320 (4 months ago)
Then Kent Hovind states that the theory of abiogenesis has never been proven but experiments have shown that amino acids and bases for DNA and RNA can be formed in reactions between ammonia and methane. Some RNA can replicate through various reactions and can also work as an enzyme. Hovind also fails to understand the concept of meiosis and has no idea of the time Evolution would take. Think how long a century is and multiply that by one million and that's less than 1/40 the estimated age of the Earth.

Kent Hovind is a LIAR and a CONVICTED FRAUDSTER!
musthavefaith (5 months ago)
liar??? what are you kidding me.. he debunks the ENTIRE evolution theory against not 1 but THREE Trained Educated Proffesors at the college who attending years of learning to be teachers of the science they study, i mean the one guy admits he couldnt even top Kents INTRO... please.. give it up people.. Kent is not only Right but he broke the barrier that evolution is trapped in and antirely Proved it wrong with the TRUTH.. Wake up!
Scrapheap71 (5 months ago)
Thanks for posting the Hovind debate. I love seeing that liar exposed for the uneducated retard that he is.
peace1love1happiness (5 months ago)
Thank you for those Kent Hovind debates. I have all of his videos but had never actually seen him in action. Its great to watch. I love it. And to note what one of the people who commented on your page... saying that its dangerous to believe in creation is the one being ignorant (i dont mean to put him down) its not dangerous to believe that! and Evolution has in NO way been proven and is far from. People who like to make comments on this really need to try and do some research about it before trying to make rude remarks that have no valid point to their response. And it is also funny to watch the Evolutionist's who Hovind debates, because they NEVER once speak about their "evidence" and NEVER answer his actual questions. It just baffles me. Anyways, sorry to waste your time. :o)
J43fan (6 months ago)
hey. though im not sure which side your on thanks for posting the Kent Hovind debates. i realy enjoyed them.
  1 - 10   Next